Minimum r±RD for leaderboard?
I know that qlstats is very low on your priority list these days, but if you ever update it again, what would be your reasoning for not implementing a minimum r±RD in addition to the already minimum game count to appear on the leaderboards. (e.g., min 50 games and min r±RD 70)
A lot of people really milk a high r±RD to inflate their stats (especially in some lesser played game modes a la FT). I guess it doesn't really matter, but if you already think that people have too much of an obsession with playing for stats, this seems like a small thing that can better reflect current ELOs based on active players and not just ELO chasers.
Just a thought
A lot of people really milk a high r±RD to inflate their stats (especially in some lesser played game modes a la FT). I guess it doesn't really matter, but if you already think that people have too much of an obsession with playing for stats, this seems like a small thing that can better reflect current ELOs based on active players and not just ELO chasers.
Just a thought